Seeds of (in)Security: California’s Abundance Paradox: Why the Hands That Feed Us Go Hungry

I. Introduction: Two Californias

The cold arrives before the sun in the Central Valley, a damp chill that seeps through layers of worn clothing. It is 4:30 a.m. In a small, overcrowded house just outside of Fresno, Elena pulls on a pair of stiff work boots, her movements quiet so as not to wake her two children. Outside, the headlights of a labor contractor’s van cut through the darkness, one of dozens fanning out across the sleeping landscape to collect the hands that will harvest the nation’s bounty. For the next ten hours, under a sun that will soon turn punishing, Elena will bend and cut, her hands moving with a practiced speed that belies the ache in her back. She will work amidst a sea of perfect, gleaming produce—strawberries, lettuce, tomatoes—destined for trucks that will carry this abundance to every corner of the country. It is food she will harvest but rarely afford to buy.

Hours later and miles to the south, the fluorescent lights of a Los Angeles grocery store hum with an indifferent buzz. Robert, a retired bus driver navigating his late seventies on a fixed Social Security check, studies the price of a small plastic clamshell of those same strawberries. He does the familiar, painful math in his head: the rising cost of his heart medication, the electric bill that crept up again last month, the rent that consumes more than half his income. The vibrant red of the fruit seems to mock him, a small luxury that has become, like so much else, a strategic sacrifice. He places the strawberries back on the shelf and picks up a can of soup instead.

These are the two Californias. One is a global agricultural powerhouse, a land of almost mythical productivity. The other is a place of quiet desperation, where millions struggle to fill their plates. As I begin this new series, “Seeds of Security,” I am drawn to this contradiction because it mirrors a truth I came to understand in the starkest of terms: some of the most formidable prisons have no bars.¹ To have your next meal be outside of your control, to have sustenance become a matter of provision rather than right, is to be shackled. This is not a story of scarcity in a barren land; it is a story of inequitable systems in a land of unparalleled plenty. California’s agricultural abundance masks a fragile and unjust structure where the very people who grow, prepare, and serve our food are the most likely to go hungry. It is a paradox born not of empty fields, but of broken systems.

II. The Paradox in Plain Numbers: A Tale of Two Harvests

To grasp the scale of California’s contradiction, one must first appreciate the sheer magnitude of its agricultural output. The numbers are staggering, painting a picture of a state that functions as the world's produce basket. California’s farms and ranches grow over a third of the United States’ vegetables and a staggering three-quarters of its fruits and nuts.² The state produces nearly half of all U.S.-grown fruits, nuts, and vegetables combined.³ For a vast array of high-value specialty crops—including almonds, walnuts, pistachios, figs, and artichokes—California is effectively the nation's sole commercial producer, accounting for 99% or more of the total supply.³

This agricultural dominance translates into immense economic value. In 2022, the market value of products sold by California's farms reached $59.0 billion, with cash receipts climbing to $61.2 billion by 2024.⁷ The Central Valley alone, a 400-mile stretch of fertile land, produces 8% of America's entire food supply by value on just 1% of its farmland.² This is the California of the public imagination: a vibrant, sun-drenched engine of prosperity, feeding the nation and the world.

But there is a second, parallel harvest: a harvest of hunger. Behind the curtain of abundance, a profound crisis of food insecurity unfolds daily. According to data from Feeding America, 5,352,790 people in California face hunger—that is 1 in every 7 people, and for children, the ratio is even worse at 1 in 6.⁹ More recent figures from the California Association of Food Banks suggest the problem is even more widespread, estimating that more than 1 in 5 Californians, or roughly 8.8 million people, struggle with food insecurity. For households with children, that rate climbs to a devastating 27%.⁵ These are not abstract statistics; they represent neighbors, classmates, and colleagues. They are the quiet reality in a state where, in 2022, the overall food insecurity rate was 12.6%, affecting nearly 5 million people.¹¹ This reflects a sharp and disturbing national trend, which saw food insecurity jump from 10.4% in 2021 to 13.5% in 2022—the highest level recorded since 2014.¹²

The very language used to describe California's agricultural prowess—"America's food-producing powerhouse" ⁴, "the state that feeds America" ²—creates a powerful but deeply misleading public narrative. This story of overwhelming plenty makes the concurrent reality of hunger seem illogical, an anomaly that must be the result of individual failure rather than systemic design. The narrative of abundance thus becomes a cognitive and political veil, obscuring the truth that the problem is not a lack of food, but a profound lack of access and justice. The paradox is not merely statistical; it is a failure of imagination and political will, embedded in the very systems that bring food from the field to our tables.

Metric	Value / Rate	Data Year	Source(s)
Agricultural Output
Agricultural Cash Receipts	$55.9 Billion	2022	7
Share of U.S. Fruits & Nuts	~75%	2024	2
Share of U.S. Vegetables	~33%	2024	2
Human Need
Total Food Insecure People	8.8 Million	2024	5
Overall Food Insecurity Rate	~22% (1 in 5 Californians)	2024	5
Child Food Insecurity Rate	~27% (in households with children)	2024	5

III. The System's Squeeze: From Farm to Fridge

The journey of food in California begins on land increasingly controlled by a shrinking number of powerful hands. The Jeffersonian ideal of the small family farm has been largely supplanted by a landscape of immense corporate operations.¹³ In California, this consolidation is stark: a mere 5% of landowners now control over half of the state's cropland. These are not local farming families expanding their operations, but large corporations, hedge funds, and investment firms acquiring vast tracts of agricultural land.¹⁴ This trend mirrors a national shift over the past three decades toward fewer, larger farms, but it is particularly acute in California, where the high cost of land and water creates insurmountable barriers for smaller players.¹⁵ As large entities buy up land, they also gain control over precious water resources, further squeezing the viability of family farms and driving a cycle of sales and consolidation.¹⁷

The Harvester's Burden: An Exploitative Labor Model

This consolidated system rests on a labor model that is fundamentally extractive. It relies on a low-wage, predominantly immigrant workforce to perform some of the most physically demanding jobs in our economy.¹⁸ This workforce is systematically excluded from many of the basic protections afforded to other American workers. Under a legal framework known as "agricultural exceptionalism," farmworkers are carved out of key federal labor laws, including the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which guarantees the right to organize, and critical provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which mandate overtime pay and rest breaks.¹⁹

This legal vulnerability translates into profound economic precarity. The gap between what a farmworker could theoretically earn and what they actually take home is a chasm. In 2015, a full-time equivalent (FTE) agricultural worker in California—someone working 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year—would have earned an average of $30,283. However, due to the seasonal and inconsistent nature of the work, the actual average annual earnings for a farmworker were just $17,445.²¹

For many, the situation is even more dire. A significant portion of the workforce is employed not by farms directly, but by Farm Labor Contractors (FLCs), who act as intermediaries. In 2015, the nearly 300,000 workers employed by FLCs had average annual earnings of less than $10,000.²¹ While California has taken steps to address this, phasing in new overtime rules (AB 1066) that will require time-and-a-half pay after an 8-hour day or 40-hour week for all employers by January 1, 2025, the initial impact has been mixed.²² Early evidence suggests that some employers are responding by capping workers' hours just below the new thresholds to avoid paying the premium, which can perversely lead to a reduction in a worker's total weekly earnings.²⁴

The FLC system is not merely a hiring convenience; it is a structural mechanism that insulates large agricultural corporations from risk and liability. By contracting out the management of their workforce, growers can maintain a flexible, on-demand labor supply while offloading legal responsibility for wage compliance, safety standards, and payroll taxes onto the contractors.¹⁸ This creates a buffer, shielding the most powerful players in the food system from the direct human and legal consequences of a low-wage, precarious labor model. The economic pressure flows downward from the corporation to the contractor, and ultimately settles on the shoulders of the worker in the field.

Portrait 1: "Elena," The Harvester

For Elena, these statistics are the architecture of her daily life. Her day begins long before her children wake and often ends after they are asleep. The work is relentless, dictated by the season and the crop. In the summer heat, which can soar well above 100 degrees, the risk of heatstroke is a constant companion, despite state regulations requiring shade and water.²⁰ Her pay is often calculated on a piece-rate basis, a system that incentivizes speed above all else, pushing her body to its limits for a wage that rarely feels like enough. After a ten-hour day harvesting vegetables, she returns home to face the cruelest irony of her profession: an empty refrigerator. Her family relies on the local food pantry, a place where she sometimes finds the very same produce she picked just days earlier, now donated as charity. Her story is not unique. In Yolo County, a 2024 report found that over half of all agricultural workers were food insecure, struggling to afford the very food they cultivate.²⁷ They are caught in a system that values their labor but not their lives, their productivity but not their sustenance.

Item	Monthly Value	Annual Value	Source(s)
Income
Average Farmworker Income (Actual, 2015 data)	$1,458	$17,500	21
Federal Poverty Line (Family of 3, 2024)	$2,156	$25,870	(External)
Income Deficit vs. Poverty Line	-$698	-$8,370
Key Expenses (Fresno County Example)
Median Rent	~$1,500	$18,000	28
Basic Groceries (Family of 3)	~$900	$10,800	30
Income vs. Just Rent & Food	-$942	-$11,300

IV. The Cost-of-Living Trap: When a Paycheck Isn't Enough

For low-wage workers in California, earning a paycheck is only the first battle. The second is trying to make that paycheck stretch in one of the most expensive states in the nation. This is the cost-of-living trap, a three-front war fought against the crushing expenses of housing, transportation, and childcare, where even a steady job cannot guarantee stability.

The Three-Front War: Housing, Transportation, and Childcare

Housing is the heaviest burden. For farmworkers, the housing crisis is particularly acute. They face disproportionately high rates of living in substandard and overcrowded conditions.³² A 2017 survey in the Salinas Valley found that 93% of farmworker households lived with more than two people per bedroom, far exceeding health and safety standards.³³ Many are severely cost-burdened, forced to spend well over the recommended 30% of their already meager income on rent, often for dilapidated trailers or rooms shared with multiple other workers.³⁴

Transportation in rural California is not a luxury; it is a lifeline. Yet, for low-income families, the cost of purchasing, insuring, and maintaining a reliable vehicle can be prohibitive.³⁵ Public transit is often sparse or non-existent, creating vast "transit deserts" that isolate communities from full-service grocery stores, healthcare facilities, and better-paying jobs.³⁷ This lack of mobility traps families in a cycle of limited options, forcing them to rely on more expensive local convenience stores for food and making it difficult to escape the economic confines of their immediate surroundings.

For working parents, the cost of childcare can be the final, breaking weight. The expense is astronomical across the state. The average annual cost for infant care in California is over $19,000, with preschool care for a four-year-old costing more than $14,000.³⁹ Even in the more "affordable" agricultural hubs of the Central Valley, the costs are staggering. In cities like Fresno and Bakersfield, full-time, center-based infant care can exceed $2,500 per month.⁴⁰ For a farmworker like Elena, this single expense could consume her entire take-home pay, forcing an impossible choice between working to earn money and staying home to care for her children.

Portrait 2: "David," The Line Cook

Before the pandemic, David’s life as a line cook in Los Angeles was a blur of heat, speed, and camaraderie. Like many in the food service industry, his own food security was intrinsically linked to his job. He earned between $14 and $16 an hour, and his main meals of the day were often the "shift meals" provided by the restaurant—a hearty salad, a portion of the day's special.⁴¹ It was a fragile stability, one he didn't fully appreciate until it was gone. When the city shut down, he lost all his shifts overnight. A trip to the grocery store revealed a new kind of panic: the shelves were bare. The rice, beans, pasta, and flour—the staples of a lean budget—had vanished. He, who had spent his life preparing food for others, suddenly found himself struggling to access it.⁴¹ His story is a powerful illustration of the precarity faced by millions of service workers, and it serves as a stark entry point into the bureaucratic labyrinth that is America's public benefits system.

The Papercut Prison: Benefit Cliffs and Churn

For workers like David, turning to public assistance programs like CalFresh (California's version of SNAP) should be a straightforward process. Instead, they often encounter a system that seems designed to punish progress. The most perverse feature of this system is the "benefit cliff." This is the point at which a small increase in earnings—a modest raise, a few extra hours a week—triggers a sudden and disproportionately large loss of public benefits, such as food stamps or a housing subsidy. The result is that the family is left financially worse off than they were before the raise, creating a powerful disincentive to seek advancement at work.⁴²

Compounding this problem is "administrative churn," the constant cycling of eligible families off and on benefits due to bureaucratic hurdles rather than any change in their need or eligibility.⁴⁴ In California, the primary driver of churn is paperwork. The data is damning: exits from the CalFresh program spike dramatically in the months when participants are required to submit recertification paperwork. Households are six times more likely to leave the program during these reporting months.⁴⁶ The California Policy Lab estimates that a staggering 500,000 income-eligible households are pushed out of CalFresh each year simply because they cannot navigate the administrative process.⁴⁶ As of 2014, the state's overall churn rate was 22%, meaning more than one in five new applicants had been on the program within the previous 90 days, with most losing their benefits at the moment their annual recertification was due.⁴⁷

This administrative burden is not a neutral inefficiency; it functions as a hidden tax on the poor. The system demands time, reliable transportation, internet access, and the cognitive energy to navigate a complex bureaucracy—all resources that poverty systematically erodes. For a single parent juggling multiple jobs, childcare, and unreliable transportation, finding the two hours required to complete a CalFresh recertification interview and gather documents can be an impossible task.⁴⁶ Churn is therefore a systemic failure that actively denies support to the very people it is intended to help, deepening their instability and pushing them closer to the edge of hunger.

V. The Geography of Access and the Weight of Age

Where you live in California profoundly dictates your access to healthy, affordable food. This is not a random accident of geography, but the result of decades of policy decisions that have created a landscape of nutritional inequality. The common term for these areas, "food deserts," is a misnomer. A desert is a natural phenomenon. What we see in California's communities is better described as "food apartheid"—a system of segregation, both racial and economic, that actively denies entire neighborhoods access to the resources required for a healthy life.⁴⁸

This system has deep historical roots in the practice of redlining, where government-backed maps designated minority neighborhoods as "hazardous" for investment, choking off access to mortgages and capital. This racial and economic segregation was followed by a corporate exodus known as "supermarket redlining." As white families moved to the suburbs in the mid-20th century, major grocery chains followed them, often abandoning their inner-city stores. In many cases, they placed restrictive covenants on the properties they sold, legally forbidding any future owner from operating a grocery store at that location, effectively scorching the earth behind them.⁵⁰ Today, this legacy is perpetuated by zoning laws that prioritize single-family homes and restrict the development of commercial enterprises like grocery stores in low-income neighborhoods, forcing residents to travel miles for fresh food.⁵²

Portrait 3: "Robert," The Elder

For Robert, the retired bus driver in Los Angeles, this geography of access is a daily, physical challenge. His fixed Social Security income is a battlefield where the costs of rent, utilities, and medication co-pays are in constant conflict with his need for food.⁵⁴ His story is a testament to the compounding vulnerabilities of age. He no longer drives, and the bus route to the nearest affordable supermarket is a two-hour round trip, an exhausting ordeal. He relies on a local senior center for a hot lunch, a place that provides not just a meal, but a crucial point of human connection that pushes back against the social isolation that so often accompanies hunger in the elderly.⁵⁵

The stories from California's senior nutrition programs are filled with people like Robert. There is Shirley, a 90-year-old on a fixed income who said that before Meals on Wheels, she depended mostly on canned foods because the cost of fresh produce was too high.⁵⁵ And there is the story of "Carol," a woman who, after losing her mother and finding herself with only $5 left at the end of each month, began receiving meals at her local senior center. The center, she said, "truly saved my life." In an act of profound gratitude, she donated that last $5 back to the program that had sustained her.⁵⁶

These stories reveal a critical truth: the challenges of food apartheid and senior hunger are not separate issues. They intersect and amplify one another, creating a vortex of vulnerability, especially in rural communities. A senior living on a fixed income in a small town, who can no longer drive and whose local grocery store has closed, is functionally trapped. They are facing an income crisis, a mobility crisis, and an access crisis all at once. This is not a personal failing; it is the direct and predictable outcome of decades of policy decisions that have systematically disinvested in both the physical infrastructure of our rural towns and the social infrastructure of our safety net for the elderly.

VI. Seeds of Change: Cultivating Solutions

Despite the systemic nature of this crisis, California is also a laboratory for innovative solutions. Across the state, programs and policies are attempting to bridge the gap between abundance and access. However, their effectiveness is often constrained by the very same structural barriers they seek to overcome. A critical examination of what is working—and what is not—is essential to charting a path forward.

From the School Cafeteria to the Farmers Market

Universal School Meals: In 2022, California became the first state in the nation to implement a universal free school meals program, a landmark policy designed to ensure every child has access to breakfast and lunch at no cost.⁵⁷ In its inaugural year, the program showed significant benefits, with a majority of school food authorities reporting increased meal participation, reduced stigma for students, and improved meal quality.⁵⁸ However, the initiative has been plagued by the same challenges affecting the broader food system: staffing shortages, supply chain disruptions, and inadequate kitchen facilities.⁵⁸ Most troublingly, while overall meal participation has returned to pre-pandemic levels, a recent analysis by the Public Policy Institute of California found that participation among low-income students has actually decreased since the program's implementation.⁵⁹ This counterintuitive trend suggests that simply making meals free is not enough to overcome other barriers, such as chronic absenteeism or issues with how low-income status is tracked, and requires urgent investigation.

Market Match: One of the clearest success stories in California's food security landscape is the Market Match program. This initiative allows CalFresh recipients to double the value of their benefits—up to a certain daily limit—when they shop for fruits and vegetables at participating farmers' markets.⁶⁰ The impact is threefold: it makes fresh, healthy, locally-grown produce more affordable for low-income families; it provides a direct economic boost to small and mid-sized California farmers; and it strengthens local economies. In 2021 alone, the program drove over $13 million in CalFresh and Market Match spending to local farmers.⁶⁰ Furthermore, research estimates that for every $1 of incentive spending, the program generates an additional $3 in local economic activity, creating a powerful ripple effect in communities that need it most.⁶⁰

Food Rescue (SB 1383): California's ambitious food recovery law, SB 1383, represents a bold attempt to tackle food waste and food insecurity simultaneously. The law requires large food businesses like supermarkets and wholesalers to donate their surplus edible food, with a goal of recovering 20% of food that would otherwise go to landfills by 2025.⁶² The program has succeeded in diverting massive quantities of food—over 200,000 tons were recovered in 2023. However, it has placed an immense and often unfunded mandate on the state's food banks and other food recovery organizations.⁶³ These organizations now face a dramatic increase in logistical and administrative work, from establishing contracts to managing a higher volume of donations. Critically, half of food banks report receiving more spoiled or inedible food that they must then pay to dispose of, and a majority report that they lack the staffing, infrastructure, and sustainable funding to manage the increased workload.⁶³

Policy Levers for a More Just Harvest

These programs, while valuable, treat the symptoms of a deeper disease. Lasting change requires pulling the policy levers that can reshape the system itself.

Income & Labor: The most direct way to address food insecurity is to ensure that people can afford food. This means strengthening labor protections for all workers in the food chain. As of January 1, 2025, California's agricultural overtime law will be fully phased in, requiring time-and-a-half pay after an 8-hour day or 40-hour week for all farm employers.²³ This is a crucial step, but it must be accompanied by robust enforcement and a commitment to a living wage that reflects the state's high cost of living.

Benefits Modernization: The state must urgently address the "papercut prison" of administrative churn in the CalFresh program. Simplifying and streamlining the recertification process to eliminate paperwork barriers is a common-sense reform that would keep hundreds of thousands of eligible families connected to vital food assistance. This push for modernization stands in stark contrast to looming federal changes. New legislation threatens to tighten work requirements, expand them to older adults, and shift administrative costs onto the state, which could cut off benefits for nearly 400,000 Californians and slash federal funding by billions.⁶⁴

Structural Investments: Ultimately, we cannot solve food insecurity in a vacuum. Food security is inextricably linked to housing and transportation security. A family that spends 60% of its income on rent is a family that is one crisis away from hunger. A senior in a rural town with no car and no bus service is a senior at risk of malnutrition. Meaningful, long-term investments in affordable housing and robust, accessible public transit—especially in rural and underserved communities—are among the most effective anti-hunger policies we can pursue.⁶⁶

VII. Conclusion: Redefining Abundance

We began with two Californias, embodied by Elena in the field and Robert in the grocery store. Their stories, and the story of David the line cook, are not anecdotes; they are indictments of a system that produces unprecedented wealth while manufacturing widespread want. But their futures are not yet written.

Imagine another California. Imagine a state where Elena’s hard labor is rewarded with a living wage, where she can walk into the same grocery store where her produce is sold and fill her cart without fear. Imagine a world where David receives a well-deserved raise, and instead of a letter cutting off his family's benefits, he receives a notice of a gradual, tapered reduction that allows him to climb the economic ladder without being pushed off. Imagine a community where Robert has access to a reliable, on-demand shuttle service that takes him and his neighbors to a new cooperative grocery store, a place where he can afford fresh food and find companionship.

This is not a utopian fantasy. It is the tangible result of the policy choices we have the power to make. This is the world we are trying to illuminate with "Seeds of Security."

True abundance is not measured in tons per acre or billions of dollars in agricultural receipts. That is merely output. True abundance, true security, is measured in the well-being of our people. It is measured by whether a child can focus in school because they are not hungry. It is measured by whether a senior must choose between medicine and a meal. And it is measured, most fundamentally, by whether the hands that plant, harvest, cook, and serve our food can afford to eat at their own tables. Food security is not an act of charity to be dispensed at the margins. It is a fundamental pillar of justice, an essential piece of public infrastructure that we must resolve to build, together.

Works cited

1. [20250925]_[Introduction].docx

2. California: the state that feeds America - Perkins Engines, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.perkins.com/en_GB/campaigns/powernews/features/california--the-state-that-feeds-america.html

3. California - Farm Service Agency - USDA, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/10cafacts_v3.pdf

4. How California Agriculture has Shaped the State and the Country, accessed September 25, 2025, https://californialocal.com/localnews/statewide/ca/article/show/36707-california-agriculture-dairy-wheat-fruit-vegetables/

5. Hunger Data & Research - California Association of Food Banks, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cafoodbanks.org/hunger-data-reports/

6. California Grows More of These Crops Than Any Other State -, accessed September 25, 2025, https://californiagrown.org/blog/california-grows-more/

7. 2022-2023 California Agricultural Statistics Review, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/Statistics/PDFs/2022-2023_california_agricultural_statistics_review.pdf

8. CDFA - Statistics - California Department of Food and Agriculture - CA.gov, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/Statistics/

9. California | Feeding America, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.feedingamerica.org/hunger-in-america/california

10. Southern California food banks urge immediate action to avoid hunger crisis - YouTube, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPlFhFxSrHQ

11. Hunger & Poverty in California__View The Interactive Map _ Map the Meal Gap, accessed September 25, 2025, https://s44345.pcdn.co/human-services-agency/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/Map-the-Meal-Gap-2022.pdf

12. Map the Meal Gap 2024 - Feeding America, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.feedingamerica.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/MMG%202024%20Executive%20Summary%20%281%29.pdf

13. a social history of farm labor in california, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cschs.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Legal-Hist-v.-15-Book-Section-Farm-Labor.pdf

14. Corporate Land Grabs, Consolidation, Equity & Access on California's Farms - YouTube, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAWGbbUBlKQ

15. California Agriculture Crossroads - AgNet West, accessed September 25, 2025, https://agnetwest.com/california-agriculture-crossroads/

16. Three Decades of Consolidation in U.S. Agriculture, accessed September 25, 2025, https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/276247.html

17. Consolidation of Farms and Water - FoodPrint, accessed September 25, 2025, https://foodprint.org/blog/consolidation-farms-water/

18. Agricultural Workforce, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/agvision/docs/agricultural_workforce.pdf

19. 31 California Farmworker Facts You Should Know, accessed September 25, 2025, https://lacooperativa.org/31-california-farmworker-facts-you-should-know/

20. Get Informed — Center for Farmworker Families, accessed September 25, 2025, https://farmworkerfamily.org/information

21. Farmworker wages in California: Large gap between full-time ..., accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.epi.org/blog/farmworker-wages-in-california-large-gap-between-full-time-equivalent-and-actual-earnings/

22. Overtime for Agricultural Workers - California Department of Industrial Relations - CA.gov, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/Overtime-for-Agricultural-Workers.html

23. Minimum Wage Increases for 2025 - Western Growers Association ..., accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.wga.com/news/minimum-wage-increases-for-2025/

24. April 2024: California's new overtime law for agricultural workers - YouTube, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxXpRGuz24M

25. Impact of Overtime on California Farm Worker Hours and Earnings | Cornell Agricultural Workforce Development, accessed September 25, 2025, https://agworkforce.cals.cornell.edu/2024/07/17/impact-of-overtime-on-california-farm-worker-hours-and-earnings/

26. Rights of Farmworkers in California - Buzzell Law Group, PC, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.buzzlaw.com/rights-of-farmworkers-in-california/

27. Yolo County farmworkers face rising food insecurity, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.capradio.org/articles/2025/06/26/yolo-county-farmworkers-face-rising-food-insecurity/

28. Cost of Living in California 2025 | RentCafe, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.rentcafe.com/cost-of-living-calculator/us/ca/

29. Central Valley Cost of Living | Jane Rosenthal Author, accessed September 25, 2025, https://janerosenthal.com/central-valley-cost-of-living/

30. Cost of Living in California - SoFi, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.sofi.com/cost-of-living-in-california/

31. How much does it cost to live in California? Housing, utilities, and more - unbiased.com, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.unbiased.com/discover/banking/what-is-the-cost-of-living-in-california

32. Farmworkers | California Department of Housing and Community Development, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-community-development/housing-elements/building-blocks/farmworkers

33. Farmworker Housing - City of Salinas, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.salinas.gov/Your-Government/Departments/Community-Development/Advanced-Planning-and-Project-Implementation/Farmworker-Housing

34. Homes for Those Who Harvest: Housing San Mateo County's Farmworkers - Silicon Valley Community Foundation, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.svcf.org/assets/files/publications/housing-smcs-farmworkers-final-june-2024.pdf

35. Mobility Justice in Rural California: Examining ... - ROSA P, accessed September 25, 2025, https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/66125/dot_66125_DS1.pdf

36. Transportation Access: A Key Employment Barrier for Rural Low-Income Families., accessed September 25, 2025, https://worksupport.com/research/documents/pdf/TransportationAccessAKeyEmploymentBarrierforRuralLowIncomeFamilies.pdf

37. Transportation Disparities Impacting Health Needs in the Redwood Coast Region - California Center for Rural Policy, accessed September 25, 2025, https://ccrp.humboldt.edu/sites/default/files/transportation.pdf

38. The Effect of California Policies on Food Deserts and Hunger By Zenita Yang, accessed September 25, 2025, https://criticaldebateshsgj.scholasticahq.com/post/3356-the-effect-of-california-policies-on-food-deserts-and-hunger-by-zenita-yang

39. Child Care Costs by State 2023 - Procare Software, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.procaresoftware.com/blog/child-care-costs-by-state-2023/

40. Cost of Child Care in California: A Breakdown for 2025 - TOOTRiS, accessed September 25, 2025, https://tootris.com/edu/blog/parents/cost-of-child-care-in-california-by-city-age-and-type-of-care-provider/

41. Feeding Each Other: Restaurant Workers and Food Insecurity ... - Resy, accessed September 25, 2025, https://blog.resy.com/2020/08/feeding-each-other-restaurant-workers-and-food-insecurity/

42. Introduction to Benefits Cliffs and Public Assistance Programs - National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/human-services/introduction-to-benefits-cliffs-and-public-assistance-programs

43. The benefits cliff, explained - Fed Communities, accessed September 25, 2025, https://fedcommunities.org/the-benefits-cliff-explained/

44. Understanding the Rates, Causes, and Costs of Churning in the SNAP, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap/understanding-rates-causes-and-costs-churning-supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap

45. Zero Churn: Providing Food and Stability to Families in Need, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cafoodbanks.org/zerochurn/

46. Pushed out by paperwork: Why eligible Californians leave CalFresh, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.capolicylab.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Pushed-out-by-paperwork-why-eligible-Californians-leave-CalFresh.pdf

47. Zero Churn in CalFresh: Providing Food and Stability to Californians in Need, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cafoodbanks.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/churn-fact-sheet.pdf

48. Environmental and Food Justice in City Planning: Our SB 1000 Database, accessed September 25, 2025, https://food.berkeley.edu/from-the-field/environmental-and-food-justice-in-city-planning-our-sb-1000-database/

49. Redlining, racism and food access in US urban cores - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed September 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9303837/

50. Food Deserts, Racism, and Antitrust Law - California Law Review, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.californialawreview.org/print/food-deserts-racism-and-antitrust-law

51. Spatial Supermarket Redlining and Neighborhood Vulnerability: A Case Study of Hartford, Connecticut - PubMed Central, accessed September 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4810442/

52. 4 Zoning Changes That Boost Local Food Security - American Planning Association, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.planning.org/planning/2021/summer/4-zoning-changes-that-boost-local-food-security/

53. Los Angeles Zoning Laws: A Future for a More Sustainable and Equitable LA | YIP Institute, accessed September 25, 2025, https://yipinstitute.org/article/los-angeles-zoning-laws-a-future-for-a-more-sustainable-and-equitable-la

54. Facts about senior hunger - Feeding America, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.feedingamerica.org/hunger-in-america/senior-hunger-facts

55. Success Stories 2022 - Older Californians Nutrition Program - Providers & Partners, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.aging.ca.gov/Providers_and_Partners/Area_Agencies_on_Aging/Older_Californians_Nutrition_Program/Success_Stories/2022/

56. Success Stories - Older Californians Nutrition Program - Providers & Partners | California Department of Aging, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.aging.ca.gov/Providers_and_Partners/Area_Agencies_on_Aging/Older_Californians_Nutrition_Program/Success_Stories/

57. Universal Meals - Transforming Schools: Superintendent's Initiatives (CA Dept of Education), accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cde.ca.gov/eo/in/ts-universalmeals.asp

58. The Benefits and Challenges of Providing School Meals during the ..., accessed September 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11206622/

59. Examining the Reach of Universal School Meals in California, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.ppic.org/blog/examining-the-reach-of-universal-school-meals-in-california/

60. Market-Match-Statewide-Impact-One-Pager-2022.pdf, accessed September 25, 2025, https://marketmatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Market-Match-Statewide-Impact-One-Pager-2022.pdf

61. Impact | Market Match, accessed September 25, 2025, https://marketmatch.org/impact/

62. Food Recovery in California - CalRecycle Home Page - CA.gov, accessed September 25, 2025, https://calrecycle.ca.gov/organics/slcp/foodrecovery/

63. How SB 1383 Has Impacted California Food Banks - California ..., accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cafoodbanks.org/blog/sb1383-impact/

64. CalFresh faces cuts amid One Big Beautiful Bill changes | abc10.com, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.abc10.com/article/news/local/california/californians-risk-losing-food-aid-under-snap-overhaul/103-01ae3755-bd54-4c4d-b0f3-7a6cb8089fce

65. CalFresh Recipients At Risk Due to H.R. 1 Changes - California Association of Food Banks, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.cafoodbanks.org/calfresh-recipients-at-risk/

66. Housing and Transportation, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.hcd.ca.gov/policy-and-research/intersectional-policy-work/housing-and-transportation